Personally, I think political correctness under the guise of "religious accommodation" has gotten way out of hand. Stores have been forced to hire or pay off people who insist on wearing religious costumes that are completely opposite to the style of clothing they sell or the brand image they want to present. Some demand multiple prayer breaks at fixed times throughout the day that must be granted no matter how busy the store is at the time. Then they want special facilities like foot baths and prayer rooms where infidels dare not enter. Fork 'em all!
If a person's religious practices are not compatible with working at a particular job under the same rules and conditions as any other worker, they should look for a different job and not seek to impose their superstitions on other workers or the employer. No one has any "right" to be hired into any particular job, especially if they think they are so special that the company and other employees have to adapt to their needs instead of the other way around.
In this specific case, MLGW was not interfering with Mr. Small's being a Witness. They didn't tell him he couldn't go to meetings or out in service. Despite Mr. Small's efforts to portray it differently, Witnesses have no "religious obligation" to attend meetings at a specific Hall or go out in service at a specific time. They are encouraged to do so, but it is not a religious obligation in the sense that most people would define a religious obligation . No one is beheaded for going to a different congregation's meetings.
There is no excuse for intentionally missing work or clocking in late without prior approval. It sure sounds like MLGW has bent over backwards to accommodate Mr. Small. Now it seems he wants to "stretch the envelope" and make the company kowtow to him even more.
In my politically incorrect opinion, when a company, regardless of size, has a certain image they want to project or has a standard way of doing things that applies to all employees in a certain position, they should not have to make religious accommodations for anyone. I think it's arrogant and presumptuous for anyone to insist that they do so. My motto would be: If this job would conflict with your religious obligations, it's not the one for you.